Agriculture and Human Values is the official journal of the Agriculture Food and Human Values Society. Since World War II agricultural production systems and food consumption patterns have undergone astonishing changes. Agricultural research has expanded the productive capacity of the world's farms tremendously but this expansion has raised questions about the sustainability of modern practices about the criteria for judging risks and benefits of chemical and biological technologies about the poor's entitlement to food production and safety in developing countries and about who will farm in the future and how. The Agriculture Food and Human Values Society is an organization of professionals dedicated to an open and free discussion of these and other related issues and to an understanding of the values that underlie alternative visions of the food and agricultural systems. The journal seeks to create educational and scholarly junctures among the humanities the social sciences food and nutrition studies and the agricultural disciplines and to promote an ethical social and biological understanding of agriculture. Contributions on a broad range of topics relating to the main theme are welcome. They should be addressed to a general academic readership while maintaining high standards of scholarship. The journal publishes essays on normative issues in assessing conventional and alternative food production marketing distribution and consumption systems on the sociology of knowledge in the areas of agriculture nutrition and food systems on the application of science and technology studies to agriculture and food systems on the philosophy of the applied agricultural sciences on critical theory applied to agriculturally related topics on social economic and agricultural development theory and on other value issues related to production and consumption systems including topics on environmental values and on animal welfare. It also publishes book reviews and reports. From time to time the editors will invite guest editors to plan issues on special themes. Submissions are double-blind reviewed from at least two disciplinary perspectives and where relevant the editors seek review comments from philosophers and social scientists as well as from the disciplines represented by the authors.
在爱尔兰使用电场运营商的全国代表性的调查，本研究考察了从劳动力配置的选择农活非金钱利益的影响。结果表明，非金钱利益同时影响到进入休的决定农村劳动力市场，也曾经作出这一决定，时间花在工作非农。我们发现我们的衍生变量代表与相关非货币性福利农活有类似的其他更广泛的效果产生重大影响申报的个人和农场的结构变量，如农场经营者的年龄，农场规模和耕作制度。这些非金钱福利的存在，有增加隐含工资的农民为他们的农活。这反过来又可能导致劳动这似乎不理想从一个纯粹的财务角度的分配。旨在创造非农机会的农村发展政策可能失败，除非返回到非农工作是高到足以弥补农民的损失带来的好处与农耕生活方式相关。从方法论的角度来看，我们的分析表示如果不非农劳动力配置的选择建模为两部分的过程可能会导致一些不正确的结论就若干解释的影响变量。的解释农民的非农劳动供给之外，将是有益的结合有关从农业中的非金钱利益的农民观念跨越了一系列的活动，这个农场行为的经济模型可能会导致多农民应对政策变化更准确的预测。
|
